1% Rule in Real Estate

The 1% Rule in Real Estate: Quick Guide for Investors

The 1% Rule in Real Estate is a simple way to screen rental properties for potential cash flow. If the monthly rent is at least 1% of the total purchase price, the property may be worth further analysis. Perfect for first-time buyers, Canadian newcomers, or US investors, this rule saves time and helps you spot promising deals quickly. In this guide, we’ll explain how it works, give examples, share its drawbacks, and show when to use or avoid, it in today’s US and Canadian markets.

What is the 1% Rule in Real Estate?

The 1% Rule in Real Estate is a simple guideline that says a rental property’s monthly rent should be at least 1% of its purchase price. For example, if a home costs $300,000, it should rent for at least $3,000 per month to meet the rule.

What is the 1% Rule in Real Estate

Its purpose is straightforward: give investors a quick screening tool to identify properties with the potential for positive cash flow before spending hours running detailed financial models. It doesn’t replace full due diligence, but it can save time by filtering out obvious mismatches between cost and income potential.

Historically, the 1% Rule became popular in the US as a back-of-the-envelope calculation for small landlords and growing real estate portfolios. Today, it’s also used in Canada, though high purchase prices in cities like Toronto and Vancouver mean investors sometimes adapt the rule to 0.8% or 0.7% to reflect local market realities.

In short, the 1% Rule in Real Estate helps investors quickly assess rental property profitability especially in competitive markets where speed matters.

How the 1% Rule Works

The 1% Rule in Real Estate is like the first handshake when meeting someone new—it gives you an instant first impression of whether a property might be worth your time. It is a quick screening method that allows you to decide if a property has potential for positive cash flow before committing to a full investment analysis.

Step-by-Step Process

  1. Identify the purchase price
    This is not just the listed price. You should include any renovation or repair costs you expect to spend before renting the property.
    Example: If a property is listed at $200,000 and requires $20,000 in renovations, your total investment is $220,000.
  2. Multiply by 1 percent
    Take your total investment and multiply it by 1 percent. This result is your target monthly rent.
    Example: $220,000 × 1% = $2,200.
  3. Compare with market rent
    Look at the actual or projected monthly rent for similar properties in the area.
  • If the rent meets or exceeds your 1 percent target, the property passes the initial screen.
  • If it falls short, you may still investigate further, but the numbers suggest cash flow could be tight.

Example: United States Market

  • Purchase price: $180,000
  • Renovations: $5,000
  • Total investment: $185,000
  • Target monthly rent: $1,850
  • Current market rent: $1,950

In this case, the property meets the 1 percent guideline. This type of deal is still possible in parts of the Midwest and South, where home prices are lower and rental yields are stronger.

Example: Canadian Market

  • Purchase price: CAD $550,000
  • Renovations: CAD $15,000
  • Total investment: CAD $565,000
  • Target monthly rent: CAD $5,650
  • Current market rent: CAD $3,200

Here, the property falls far below the 1 percent benchmark. This is common in large Canadian cities such as Toronto and Vancouver, where property prices are significantly higher than average rents. Investors in these markets often focus more on long-term appreciation than on immediate cash flow.

Why It Is Only a Rule of Thumb

The 1% Rule does not account for several important factors:

  • Financing costs: In 2025, US 30-year fixed mortgage rates are around 6 to 7 percent, while Canada’s 5-year fixed rates often exceed 5 percent. Higher interest rates reduce monthly cash flow.
  • Taxes and insurance: Property tax rates vary widely, from more than 2 percent of assessed value annually in parts of the US Northeast to far lower in Alberta. Insurance costs also differ by location and property type.
  • Vacancy and maintenance: Periods without tenants or unexpected repairs can significantly impact returns.

Because of these limitations, the 1% Rule should be used only as a starting filter. Once a property passes this test, you should move on to more detailed calculations such as cash-on-cash return, cap rate, and IRR.

US vs Canada Expectations

  • United States: In smaller cities and certain regions, it is still possible to find properties meeting or slightly exceeding the 1% Rule, especially in stable rental markets.
  • Canada: In major metros, even 0.6 percent can be considered acceptable if the property is located in an area with strong long-term growth potential. For example, a $500,000 condo in Vancouver renting for $3,000 a month represents a 0.6 percent yield, which is low for cash flow but may still be appealing for appreciation-focused investors.

The One Percent Rule vs. Other Types of Calculations

The 1% Rule in Real Estate is like a speed-reading tool for investment properties: it lets you scan through potential deals and quickly reject the ones that obviously won’t produce enough rental income.

But quick doesn’t mean complete. Successful investors know that the 1% Rule is only the first step a quick glance at a map before you start a road trip. For the actual journey, you’ll need other navigational tools like the 2% Rule, Cap Rate, and Cash-on-Cash Return to make sure your investment is truly worth it.

What is the 1% Rule in Real Estate

1. The 2% Rule

  • Definition
     The 2% Rule says that the monthly rent of a property should be at least two percent of its purchase price. It’s basically the 1% Rule’s more demanding cousin — focused almost entirely on maximizing cash flow.
  • Purpose
     The idea is to ensure that the property generates enough income to cover operating expenses, debt, and still leave a healthy profit.
  • Reality Check
     In the current markets of major cities like Toronto, Vancouver, New York, and San Francisco, finding a property that meets the 2% Rule is almost impossible unless you’re buying in distressed or low-demand areas. You might find it in smaller towns or in markets with very low purchase prices, but these often carry higher risks like low tenant demand or slower property appreciation.
  • Example
     If you buy a property for $150,000, the 2% Rule says you should be charging at least $3,000 per month in rent. That’s achievable in certain rural US markets, but in most Canadian cities, it’s unrealistic.

2. Capitalization Rate (Cap Rate)

  • Definition
     Cap rate is a more sophisticated profitability measure. It’s the ratio of a property’s annual net operating income (NOI) rental income minus operating expenses to the property’s purchase price.
  • Purpose
     Cap rate lets you compare properties regardless of whether you’re financing them or buying them in cash. It’s a way to judge the property’s pure income potential without the noise of mortgage details.
  • Why It Matters
     A higher cap rate generally signals better cash flow, but it can also mean higher risk. For example, properties in less desirable neighborhoods might have higher cap rates because they’re cheaper to buy but harder to rent or sell later.
  • Example
     If your property earns $18,000 per year in NOI and you paid $300,000 for it, your cap rate is 6%. That’s considered average-to-good in many stable Canadian cities right now, while some US markets with higher risk offer 8% or more.

3. Cash-on-Cash Return

  • Definition
     Cash-on-cash return measures how much pre-tax cash flow you’re making compared to the actual cash you invested (down payment, closing costs, renovations).
  • Purpose
     It’s perfect for understanding how well your own money not the bank’s is performing in the deal. This is especially relevant in Canada and the US right now, where mortgage rates are higher and financing decisions heavily impact returns.
  • Why It’s Useful
     Two investors could buy the same property for the same price, but if one puts more cash down and the other leverages financing, their cash-on-cash returns can look very different.
  • Example
     If you invest $80,000 in total cash and the property gives you $8,000 per year in pre-tax cash flow, your cash-on-cash return is 10%. That number helps you compare it directly to other investments like stocks, REITs, or even another rental property in a different city.

Why Investors Mix Methods

No single metric tells the full story.

  • The 1% Rule gives you a quick thumbs-up or thumbs-down.
  • The Cap Rate tells you how the property performs regardless of financing.
  • The Cash-on-Cash Return tells you how your own money is working for you.
  • The 2% Rule can be a dream target for high cash flow though rarely realistic in big cities.

Many seasoned investors start with the 1% Rule to quickly screen a large number of listings, then run cap rate and cash-on-cash calculations to narrow down serious contenders.

Comparison Table: 1% Rule vs. Other Methods

Metric

Main Purpose

Includes Expenses?

Considers Financing?

Ease of Calculation

Best Use Case

1% Rule

Quick rental yield screening

No

No

Very Easy

First pass evaluation

2% Rule

Identify high cash flow deals

No

No

Very Easy

Rare deals in low-cost markets

Cap Rate

Compare profitability across properties

Yes

No

Moderate

Benchmarking across markets

Cash-on-Cash Return

Evaluate return on actual invested cash

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Financing impact and investment efficiency

IRR

Measure total annualized return over holding period

Yes

Yes

Complex

Long-term, multi-year investment analysis

When to Use the 1% Rule

The 1% Rule in Real Estate works best when you’re operating in affordable, cash-flow-oriented markets  areas where property prices are relatively low compared to rents.

When to Use the 1% Rule

Ideal Scenarios:

  • Small to mid-sized single-family rentals in the Midwest US (e.g., Cleveland, Indianapolis, Kansas City) or smaller Canadian cities like Moncton, Windsor, or Regina.
  • First-pass screening when looking through dozens of listings, it helps you quickly weed out overpriced properties that will struggle to produce positive cash flow.
  • Undervalued or distressed properties where you can purchase at a discount, renovate, and set market rents that meet or exceed the 1% threshold.

Why It Works Here:
 These markets typically have stable tenant demand, lower purchase prices, and operating costs that make it possible to hit or surpass the 1% target without taking excessive risk.

When Not to Use the 1% Rule

There are markets and scenarios where the 1% Rule is not just unhelpful, it can actually be misleading.

Scenarios Where It Fails:

  • High-price, low-rent markets like Vancouver, Toronto, San Francisco, or New York City. In these cities, property prices are so high relative to rents that hitting 1% is nearly impossible without severely underpricing the asset or ignoring other factors.
  • Luxury rentals where the primary investment play is appreciation, not monthly cash flow. The 1% Rule undervalues these properties because it ignores long-term equity growth potential.
  • Short-term rental or vacation markets (Airbnb-style) where revenue comes from nightly rates, seasonal demand, and occupancy rates. The monthly rent assumption of the 1% Rule doesn’t capture the volatility or potential upside of these investments.

Why It Doesn’t Fit:
In these cases, relying on the 1% Rule can cause you to dismiss properties that might deliver significant returns through appreciation, tax benefits, or alternative rental models.

Drawbacks of the 1% Rule

While it’s an efficient screening tool, the 1% Rule in Real Estate has some serious blind spots that investors must be aware of before making a purchase decision.

Limitations:

  • Ignores operating costs such as property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and vacancy rates all of which can erode cash flow even if you meet the 1% threshold.
  • Doesn’t account for financing structure whether you buy with all cash or a high-interest mortgage drastically changes your returns, but the 1% Rule treats them the same.
  • Overlooks regional rental control laws particularly in big Canadian cities like Toronto and Vancouver where rent increase caps limit future income growth.
  • Can cause missed opportunities in appreciation-focused markets a property might fail the 1% test but still deliver strong long-term ROI through value growth and equity build-up.

The 1% Rule should be treated as an initial filter, not the sole deciding factor. It works best when paired with more detailed metrics like Cap Rate, Cash-on-Cash Return, or Internal Rate of Return to reveal the property’s true performance potential.

How to Use the 1% Rule in Real Estate 

The 1% Rule in Real Estate is most effective when it’s part of a structured, step-by-step evaluation process rather than the only calculation you rely on. Here is how to apply it in a practical way:

  • Step 1: Screen properties quickly using the 1% threshold
    When browsing listings, take the asking price and calculate one percent of it. If the projected monthly rent meets or exceeds that figure, the property passes this first test. This allows you to eliminate overpriced or underperforming properties without spending hours running detailed models.
  • Step 2: Create a shortlist for deeper evaluation
    From your initial screening, select the properties that pass the 1% Rule. These become your shortlist for more thorough analysis using metrics such as capitalization rate, projected cash flow, or internal rate of return.
  • Step 3: Run the real numbers
    Replace estimates with actual data. This means calculating based on real property taxes, insurance costs, maintenance reserves, financing terms, and realistic vacancy rates. This step often reveals that some “1% Rule winners” do not actually produce healthy returns once expenses are factored in.
  • Step 4: Align the property with your investment strategy
    Decide whether your primary goal is monthly cash flow or long-term appreciation. The 1% Rule works well for cash-flow-oriented investors, but may not apply in markets where appreciation potential outweighs rental income. By understanding your strategy, you can make informed choices about which properties deserve your capital.

Conclusion

The 1% Rule in Real Estate is a simple yet powerful starting point for evaluating rental properties in the US and Canada. While it helps investors quickly identify potential cash-flow opportunities, it should never replace deeper financial analysis. Used wisely, it can save time, focus your search, and help you move confidently toward properties that match your investment goals.

Back to blog